Did Palin Ban Books from Wasilla Library?

Mayor’s Office Responds and Online List Not Verifiable

Campaign Logo - McCain Palin Campaign
Campaign Logo - McCain Palin Campaign
Did Sarah Palin attempt to ban books from the Wasilla Library? The Wasilla mayor office's reply should quash online rumors and discredit a widely circulated book list.

An online list claims to give titles of books Sarah Palin wanted banned from the Wasilla, Alaska library. The list is credited to Brian Moses, an Obama fan with a website promoting the Obama/Biden ticket.

Accompanying the list is the allegation that Palin tried to fire librarian Mary Ellen Baker for not supporting her book bans. It reports the town rallied around Baker and Palin launched vendettas against opponents.

List Contains Chaucer and Shakesperean Classics

The list includes a dictionary and Bible, classics Huckleberry Finn and Tom Sawyer, Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales, two Shakesperean plays, the Harry Potter series, and works by William Faulkner, John Steinbeck, Maya Angelou, Aristophanes, Walt Whitman and Stephen King.

A Sept. 7 request to the Wasilla librarian, answered by the office of Mayor Dianne M. Keller, says the town librarian researched the online list's origin and concludes it is from a website listing books banned by U. S. libraries over several decades.

The mayor’s office cited library policy on “reconsideration requests of library materials, noting “we have no records of any books being ‘banned or censured’ ever.”

Wasilla Library Policy on Reconsideration Requests

The library, part of the Matanuska-Susitna Library Network, claims it keeps challenged materials in circulation until a decision is reached. Library records reflect only four such challenges were processed.

  • Pre-1986 challenge to Angel Dust Blues by Todd Strasser. Result: creation of library "young adult” section and placement of book there.
  • 1986 challenge of Harvey Allard's Bumps in the Night; remained on shelf.
  • 2005 challenge to Jon Steward's America: A Citizen’s Guide to Democracy Inaction; remained on shelf.
  • 2007 challenge to The Abduction by Mette Newth; remained on shelf.

The policy statement states: “The Wasilla Public Library recognizes the right of every citizen to read and gather information, and his or her right to freedom from censorship by other persons. Many books are controversial...The library holds censorship to be a purely individual matter and declares that while anyone is free to reject for himself books and other materials of which he does not approve, he cannot exercise this right of censorship to restrict the freedom of others.”

American freedom of the press means that, as the list circulated online, people added comments, many of them inflammatory. People influenced by such comments seldom consider who said what and don’t look for motives.

Tracing the Internet Evidence Trail

The Brian Moses website alleges the list came from “librarian.net”. Sound like a credible professional source? If so, one might believe—without proof—that Wasilla officials were putting a good face on a local uproar caused by Palin.

The problem? “librarian.net” is a blog site for librarians. A rural Vermont library consultant put out a disclaimer: “There’s some buzz being generated that says that this post contains a comment that lists the books that Palin supposedly wanted banned. There appears to be no truth to the claim made by the commenter, and no further documentation or support for this has turned up.”

Bloggers pounced on the submitter, requesting unbiased sources. Responsible librarians tried to document the list. As of today (Sept. 9), it appears this came about because of a one paragraph comment in a responsibly-written Times Magazine article about Palin injecting her religious views into her mayoral role.

Someone took that article, blended that paragraph with their negative outlook and spliced to it the legitimate lists of books banned over the course of many years by various U. S. libraries. That had to be a deliberate attempt to discredit Sarah Palin.

The ages-old lesson: Don’t believe everything you hear or read.

A companion article discusses the negative financial impact of the media blitz on Palin's hometown of Wasilla, Alaska.

ROSEMARY E. BACHELOR, by IPC Photo, Inc. (Concord, Ont., Canada)

Rosemary E. Bachelor - Rosemary Bachelor, a prize-winning journalist, has had a career as an editor, feature writer, magazine publisher and author. Her latest ...

rss
Advertisement

Comments

Sep 9, 2008 8:27 AM
Guest :
The original post discussed here is obviously questionable. Here, however, is credible evidence from the Alaska media that Palin attempted to ban books in Wasilla: http://www.adn.com/sarah-palin/story/515512.html
Sep 10, 2008 10:52 AM
Scott Jackman :
Did Sarah Palin attempt to "ban books" or did she ask about the "procedure to ban books." If you are going to make suggetive comments, ensure your comments are based on fact. Even this article which is "legitimate" has no facts. It simply has possible suggestions made by one employee.
Sep 10, 2008 2:31 PM
Guest :
Palin asked Emmons, the librarian, if she'd be willing to remove some books if she asked her to and Emmons said would never consider doing that. A few weeks later Emmons got a letter from Palin firing her, citing differences in policy issues. While Palin apparently didn't specifically ask Emmons to remove any books its no stretch to believe she wanted the option to do so.

As a former librarian I can't imagine any mayor even asking a question like that. She'd be over-stepping her powers as mayor as well as insulting the librarian. Palin was apparently clueless as to the role of public libraries in the US
Sep 10, 2008 3:19 PM
Guest :
To Scott Jackman above.
From the Librarian again.

There is no "procedure to ban books" at any public library. Any such procedure would be the antithesis of the whole public library mission. If Palin had asked this question it would have been just as stupid and insulting.
Sep 29, 2008 7:11 AM
Guest :
Guest September 10, 2:31

You need to do some more research. I thought librarians were supposed to be good at that.

By now (end of September) you hopefully have had the time line clarified on the "firing." That's a clue to go to a reliable source, not an Obama source, to check it out. But perhaps you
ve moved on, secure in your knowledge that you have the info correctly.

Also perhaps you will discover that the librarian was the girl friend of the fired police chief. The "firings" were not unusual and occur regularly in places where the offices are not elected and serve at the pleasure of the head honcho.

Also -- there is no evidence that Mayor Palin asked the librarian if she would remove books if *she* (Mayor Palin) asked her to.

The finer points of who and what need to be clarified, not embroidered. The library HAD a policy and HAS a policy, as do most libraries. (You should know that.) It is a matter of informing the Mayor what the policy was, not turning it into a witch-hunt to serve political pay backs.

Good explanation here at Suite 101.
5 Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement