US Population Clock Ticks Toward 309 Million

New Form of People Watching Tied to Social Consciousness

Population Doubled in 50 Years (1900-1951) - public domain
Population Doubled in 50 Years (1900-1951) - public domain
According to the Census Bureau, the U. S. population is nearly 309 million. Anyone can watch the population clock tick away.

There is one birth every 7 seconds and one death every 12 seconds. There is also one new international migrant every 30 seconds. The net gain is one more person every 12 seconds.

Need to Know

Why know these population figures? They impact on the quantity and quality of life in America. In turn, what happens in North America has worldwide significance, a cause and effect relationship demonstrated by the 2009 global financial meltdown.

Social consciousness brings with it awareness of factors behind momentous decisions on energy use and depletion, implementing the right immigration policies and assessing the nation’s ability to provide health care and social security benefits on an equitable basis.

This knowledge helps plan, provide, manage and maintain sufficient infrastructure to house, educate, feed and transport large numbers of people.

How the Population Clock Works

The population clock momentum is based upon national population estimates, using the latest available data on births, deaths, and international migration.

Each year the population clock is recalibrated when the bureau releases its new set of population estimates. Documentation detailing this process is provided through links on the population clock website.

Historical Perspective

The first U. S. census, taken in 1790, recorded four million Americans. By 1900, the population had grown to 76 million, a figure that had slightly more than doubled to just short of 154 million by 1951. By 2000, the population had increased to 281 million. The current projection is that the population will reach 308 million by 2010 and 439 million by 2050.

Much has been written about the baby boomers. Since 1900, there have been only three years that the population did not increase: 1918, 1944 and 1945. There was only one year in that time period when the population increase was more than 3%. That was the boomers: a 7.5 million increase in 1946, making a 5.72% increase that year.

The population increase is not only about the boomers. Since 1991, we have had an annual increase of more than 3 million. At 3:40 a.m. on Monday, Aug. 17, 2009, the population was at 307,195,728.

The Bottom Line

The issues faced by today’s society are complex ones. Reacting on a gut level to how we feel about such things as Mexican immigrants, the price of fuel, and mortgage interest rates—to name just a few crisis areas—is an increasingly careless approach. Population data is only one ingredient of the decision-making melange. There are numerous other data sets that back up policy decisions and legislative efforts.

The bottom line? An informed citizenry and leaders with intellectual prowess are needed to move the United States and Canada into a safe, secure and productive future. The overly simplistic Sarah Palins of the world do a democracy no favors by taking pot shots at intellectuals and claiming they have no sense of reality.

SOURCE: The United States Bureau of the Census

ROSEMARY E. BACHELOR, by IPC Photo, Inc. (Concord, Ont., Canada)

Rosemary E. Bachelor - Rosemary Bachelor, a prize-winning journalist, has had a career as an editor, feature writer, magazine publisher and author. Her latest ...

rss
Advertisement

Comments

Dec 20, 2008 4:52 AM
Guest :
Excellent post. Rampant population growth threatens our economy and quality of life. I'm not talking just about the obvious problems that we see in the news - growing dependence on foreign oil, carbon emissions, soaring commodity prices, environmental degradation, etc. I'm talking about the effect upon rising unemployment and poverty in America.

I should introduce myself. I am the author of a book titled "Five Short Blasts: A New Economic Theory Exposes The Fatal Flaw in Globalization and Its Consequences for America." To make a long story short, my theory is that, as population density rises beyond some optimum level, per capita consumption of products begins to decline out of the need to conserve space. People who live in crowded conditions simply don’t have enough space to use and store many products. This declining per capita consumption, in the face of rising productivity (per capita output, which always rises), inevitably yields rising unemployment and poverty.

This theory has huge implications for U.S. policy toward population management. Our policies that encourage high rates of population growth are rooted in the belief of economists that population growth is a good thing, fueling economic growth. Through most of human history, the interests of the common good and business (corporations) were both well-served by continuing population growth. For the common good, we needed more workers to man our factories, producing the goods needed for a high standard of living. This population growth translated into sales volume growth for corporations. Both were happy.

But, once an optimum population density is breached, their interests diverge. It is in the best interest of the common good to stabilize the population, avoiding an erosion of our quality of life through high unemployment and poverty. However, it is still in the interest of corporations to fuel population growth because, even though per capita consumption goes into decline, total consumption still increases. We now find ourselves in the position of having corporations and economists influencing public policy in a direction that is not in the best interest of the common good.

Pete Murphy
Author, "Five Short Blasts"
http://PeteMurphy.wordpress.com
1
Advertisement
Advertisement